Abstract
Abstract A hand search of the original papers in seven medical journals over 5 years was conducted in order to identify those reporting qualitative research. A total of 210 papers were initially identified, of which 70 used qualitative methods of both data collection and analysis. These papers were evaluated by the researchers using a checklist which specified the criteria of good practice. Overall, 2% of the original papers published in the journals reported qualitative studies. Papers were more frequently positively assessed in terms of having clear aims, reporting research for which a qualitative approach was appropriate and describing their methods of data collection. Papers were less frequently positively assessed in relation to issues of data analysis such as validity, reliability and providing representative supporting evidence. It is concluded that the full potential of qualitative research has yet to be realized in the field of health care.
Keywords
MedicineQualitative researchHealth careNursingPsychologySociologyPolitical science
MeSH Terms
Data CollectionEvaluation Studies as TopicHealth Services ResearchHumansResearch Design
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period
BackgroundChoosing a suitable sample size in qualitative research is an area of conceptual debate and practical uncertainty. That sample size principles, guidelines and tools ha...
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies
BackgroundFocus group studies are increasingly published in health related journals, but we know little about how researchers use this method, particularly how they determine th...
The Medical Review Article: State of the Science
Fifty reviews published during June 1985 to June 1986 in four major medical journals were assessed in a study of the methods of current review articles. Assessments were based o...
Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research
This is the first in a series of three articles In the past decade, qualitative methods have become more commonplace in areas such as health services research and health techn...
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests
To review empirical studies that assess saturation in qualitative research in order to identify sample sizes for saturation, strategies used to assess saturation, and guidance w...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1996
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-179
- Citations
- 111
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
111
OpenAlex
4
Influential
63
CrossRef
Cite This
Mary Boulton,
Ray Fitzpatrick,
Clare Swinburn
(1996).
Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
, 2
(3)
, 171-179.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00041.x
- PMID
- 9238586