Abstract

Methods of ordination are multivariate statistical techniques designed to order individual entities on the basis of the similarities or differences for variables scored for each entity. These methods, most of which are based on linear-model theory, often fail to order entities correctly because of the nonlinear relationships among the observed variables. Under simple assumptions, the joint distribution of entities viewed in multidimensional variable space results in a curved structure that is called the circumplex in psychology, the horseshoe in archaeology, and the arch in ecology. We review the reasons for the formation of this structure and point out the limitations of traditional ordination methods for resolving data with this structure. We argue that detrended correspondence analysis, although designed as a new, improved ordination method, is no better and perhaps worse than traditional methods. All methods are influenced by data curvature and scaling. Until more-effective ordination methods can be developed, we recommend reporting the arch unscaled in two dimensions, even though it is a one-dimensional form.

Keywords

OrdinationDetrended correspondence analysisMultidimensional scalingComputer sciencePrincipal component analysisCurvatureCorrespondence analysisVariable (mathematics)ArchMathematicsEconometricsEcologyData miningStatisticsArtificial intelligenceGeographyMathematical analysis

Related Publications

Principal component analysis

Abstract Principal component analysis (PCA) is a multivariate technique that analyzes a data table in which observations are described by several inter‐correlated quantitative d...

2010 Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Compu... 9554 citations

Exploratory Projection Pursuit

Abstract A new projection pursuit algorithm for exploring multivariate data is presented that has both statistical and computational advantages over previous methods. A number o...

1987 Journal of the American Statistical A... 787 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
129
Issue
3
Pages
434-448
Citations
276
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

276
OpenAlex

Cite This

Daniel Wartenberg, Scott Ferson, F. James Rohlf (1987). Putting Things in Order: A Critique of Detrended Correspondence Analysis. The American Naturalist , 129 (3) , 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1086/284647

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/284647