Abstract

Psychiatry in the Army did a reasonably creditable job primarily because of the devotion and integrity and ability of a small group of men. It failed in a good many ways and some of these failures were because we in psychiatry failed to select and train new and better men; because we were too inarticulate. Psychiatry has had opened to it great and broad vistas of opportunity and need, many of which were apparent following World War I. But it is saddening to see how few were followed and reached these needs. Perhaps psychiatry still is not ready to rise to the occasion to meet these needs. Perhaps its body of knowledge is not sufficiently great to tackle them. Our best hope lies in the cohesion of our forces, a plan of strategy, a conviction as to the importance of the job, and a self-sacrificing aggressive, militant leadership.

Keywords

ConvictionMilitantPsychologyPsychiatryCohesion (chemistry)CriminologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Related Publications

What We Haven't Learned

EARLY SUMMER 1950 marked an unnecessary nadir for the professionals of the US Army. Following World War II, the United States once again disarmed to a degree far below the level...

2000 Military review 2 citations

Publication Info

Year
1947
Type
article
Volume
103
Issue
5
Pages
577-586
Citations
37
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

37
OpenAlex

Cite This

William C. Menninger (1947). PSYCHIATRIC EXPERIENCE IN THE WAR, 1941-1946. American Journal of Psychiatry , 103 (5) , 577-586. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.103.5.577

Identifiers

DOI
10.1176/ajp.103.5.577