Abstract
Objectives A recent review of problem‐based learning’s effect on knowledge and clinical skills updated findings reported in 1993. The author argues that effect sizes (ES) seen with PBL have not lived up to expectations (0.8–1.0) and the theoretical basis for PBL, contextual learning theory, is weak. The purposes of this study were to analyse what constitutes reasonable ES in terms of the impacts on individuals and published reports, and to elaborate upon various theories pertaining to PBL. Design Normal theory is used to demonstrate what various ESs would mean for individual change and a large meta‐analysis of over 10 000 studies is referred to in identifying typical ESs. Additional theories bearing upon PBL are presented. Results Effect sizes of 0.8–1.0 would require some students to move from the bottom quartile to the top half of the class or more. The average ES reported in the literature was 0.50 and many commonly used and accepted medical procedures and therapies are based upon studies with ESs below 0.50. Conclusions Effect sizes of 0.8–1.0 are an unreasonable expectation from PBL because, firstly, the degree of changes that would be required of individuals would be excessive, secondly, leading up to medical school, students are groomed and selected for success in a traditional curriculum, expecting them to do better in a PBL curriculum than a traditional curriculum is an unreasonable expectation, and, thirdly, the average study reported in the literature and many commonly used and accepted medical procedures and therapies are based upon studies having lesser ESs. Information‐processing theory, Cooperative learning, Self‐determination theory and Control theory are suggested as providing better theoretical support for PBL than Contextual learning theory. Even if knowledge acquisition and clinical skills are not improved by PBL, the enhanced work environment for students and faculty that has been consistently found with PBL is a worthwhile goal.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The psychological basis of problem-based learning
Several potential advantages for students' learning are claimed for problem-based learning (PBL). Students in PBL curricula may be more highly motivated; they may be better prob...
Problem-based learning
The effects of problem-based learning (PBL) were examined by conducting a meta-analysis-type review of the English-language international literature from 1972 to 1992. Compared ...
Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research
The purpose of this review is to synthesize all available evaluative research from 1970 through 1992 that compares problem-based learning (PBL) with more traditional methods of ...
Assessing the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Lessons from the Literature
Abstract Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an innovative educational approach that is gaining prominence in higher education. A review of the literature of PBL outcomes summarizes...
Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning Curricula
The review of the literature revealed no convincing evidence that PBL improves knowledge base and clinical performance, at least not of the magnitude that would be expected give...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 729-738
- Citations
- 417
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00753.x