Abstract

Two models of the factors leading to organizational commitment are compared: the member-based model, which holds that commitment originates in the actions and personal attributes of the organizational member, and the organization-based model, which is based on the premise that commitment reflects a member's reciprocation for the organization's having provided resources that satisfy important needs. Although the latter model received more support from the data, both models explained significant amounts of variance in commitment. Contrary to the preponderance of related research findings, extrinsic aspects of satisfaction were more strongly associated with organizational commitment, than were intrinsic aspects. This finding was attributed to the composition of the respondent sample, a group of blue-collar, unionized employees.

Keywords

Organizational commitmentRespondentPsychologyPremiseVariance (accounting)Social psychologySample (material)Affective events theoryJob satisfactionBusinessPolitical scienceJob performance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1983
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
123-146
Citations
298
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

298
OpenAlex

Cite This

Harold L. Angle, James L. Perry (1983). Organizational Commitment. Work and Occupations , 10 (2) , 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888483010002001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0730888483010002001