Abstract
S ummary . This paper describes an attempt to identify different levels of processing of information among groups of Swedish university students who were asked to read substantial passages of prose. Students were asked questions about the meaning of the passages and also about how they set about reading the passages. This approach allows processes and strategies of learning to be examined, as well as the outcomes in terms of what is understood and remembered. The starting point of this research was that learning has to be described in terms of its content. From this point differences in what is learned, rather than differences in how much is learned, are described. It was found that in each study a number of categories (levels of outcome) containing basically different conceptions of the content of the learning task could be identified. The corresponding differences in level of processing are described in terms of whether the learner is engaged in surface‐level or deep‐level processing.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Self-efficacy, attribution, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences.
This study examined grade- and achievement-level differences in 4th-, 7th-, and lOth-grade students' control-related beliefs and relations between students' beliefs and their re...
Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment
Student engagement increases student satisfaction, enhances student motivation to learn, reduces the sense of isolation, and improves student performance in online courses. This...
ACCURACY VERSUS SPEED IN THE GENERALIZED EFFORT OF LEARNING‐DISABLED CHILDREN
Reinforcement of effortful performance in a given academic task has been found to increase the subsequent performance of other academic tasks. The learned‐effort hypothesis assu...
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
This publication presents the theory underlying the PISA 2018 assessment -the seventh since the programme's inception.It includes frameworks for assessing the three core subject...
Training Self-checking Routines for Estimating Test Readiness: Generalization from List Learning to Prose Recall
Brown and Barclay (Child Development, 1976, 47, 71-80) trained educable retarded children to use either of two memory strategies, Anticipation or Rehearsal, involving a self-che...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1976
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-11
- Citations
- 4468
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x