Abstract

This article makes a case that collaborative planning is becoming more important because it can result in network power. Collaborative policy processes are increasingly in use as ways of achieving results in an era distinguished by rapid change, social and political fragmentation, rapid high volume information flow, global interdependence, and conflicting values. Network power can be thought of as a flow of power in which participants all share. It comes into being most effectively when three conditions govern the relationship of agents in a collaborative network: diversity, interdependence, and authentic dialogue (DIAD). Like a complex adaptive system, the DIAD network as a whole is more capable of learning and adaptation in the face of fragmentation and rapid change than a set of disconnected agents. Planners have many roles in such networks, and planning education needs to incorporate new subject matter to better prepare planners for these roles.

Keywords

DiadKnowledge managementComputer sciencePower (physics)Set (abstract data type)Public relationsBusinessProcess managementManagement scienceSociologyPolitical scienceEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Planning in the Face of Power

Abstract Information is a source of power in the planning process. This article begins by assessing five perspectives of the planner's use of information: those of the technicia...

2018 Journal of the American Planning Asso... 1493 citations

Exchange and Power in Social Life

In his landmark study of exchange and power in social life, Peter M. Blau contributes to an understanding of social structure by analyzing the social processes that govern the r...

2017 13435 citations

Publication Info

Year
2002
Type
article
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
221-236
Citations
548
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

548
OpenAlex

Cite This

David E. Booher, Judith E. Innes (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research , 21 (3) , 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x0202100301

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0739456x0202100301