Abstract
This article considers how democracy gets done, and undone, at the micro-level of the planning meeting. I use concepts of social performance to frame issues of culture and power that have received limited attention in earlier planning research. Drawing on three brief ethnographic accounts of a public interaction or “speech occasion,” I extend Forester's call for planners and policy professionals to understand and respond to the diverse communication styles and subtle power relations that shape public life. Informed responses are critical if planners aim to learn and get results while meaningfully involving various “publics” or stakeholders in decisions. Without such competence, many efforts to deliberate to “do” democracy in a diverse society will struggle along at needlessly high levels of confusion, distrust, and even resentment.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Planning in the Face of Power
Abstract Information is a source of power in the planning process. This article begins by assessing five perspectives of the planner's use of information: those of the technicia...
Network Power in Collaborative Planning
This article makes a case that collaborative planning is becoming more important because it can result in network power. Collaborative policy processes are increasingly in use a...
Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis
Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the International Communication Association/Speech Communication Association Conference on Interpretive Approaches to Organizati...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- Citations
- 114
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1177/0739456x9801800101