Keywords
ScopusScrutinyAmusementMeta-analysisMedicineMEDLINESkepticismPublicationPublication biasPsychologyFamily medicinePolitical scienceInternal medicinePhilosophyLawSocial psychology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is t...
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
On a shelf in the sunny, open‐plan office of Cochrane Australia in Melbourne, there's a large, white ring‐binder that, it's fair to say, hasn't been opened in a while. It's a pr...
Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia
Background A recent review suggested an association between using unpublished scales in clinical trials and finding significant results. Aims To determine whether such an associ...
Any casualties in the clash of randomised and observational evidence?
Randomised controlled trials and observational studies are often seen as mutually exclusive, if not opposing, methods of clinical research. Two recent reports, however, identifi...
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1997
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 350
- Issue
- 9085
- Pages
- 1182-1182
- Citations
- 385
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
385
OpenAlex
Cite This
Ciarán P. Kelly
(1997).
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
The Lancet
, 350
(9085)
, 1182-1182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63834-2
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63834-2