Abstract

While it is recognized that quality of life is ultimately as important as quantity of life, efforts to implement quality of life measurement often fail. Two basic reasons for that failure include: 1) definitional differences, where different investigators attribute different meaning to the term and, as a result, are measuring different endpoints; and 2) insufficient information about available measures, which can lead to improper test selection and unnecessary regeneration of new items. Included in this paper is a table that reviews many available quality of life measures that have been designed for, or frequently used with, people with cancer. Proper selection of measures and supplementary questions is an important first step toward a successful evaluation of quality of life.

Keywords

Selection (genetic algorithm)Quality (philosophy)Quality of life (healthcare)Risk analysis (engineering)Meaning (existential)Computer scienceMedicinePsychologyArtificial intelligenceEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life

Clinicians and policymakers are recognizing the importance of measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) to inform patient management and policy decisions. Self- or intervi...

1993 Annals of Internal Medicine 3924 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
29-38; discussion 69
Citations
534
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

534
OpenAlex

Cite This

Cella Df, David S. Tulsky (1990). Measuring quality of life today: methodological aspects.. PubMed , 4 (5) , 29-38; discussion 69.