Abstract
This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identifies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing legitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Exploring State–Civil Society Collaboration: Policy Partnerships in Developing Countries
This article examines state–civil society partnerships for policy implementation, focusing on the basic factors partnerships need to deal with to be effective. These include spe...
The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields
Instead of examining why organizations are dissimilar, this study explores why organizations tend to be increasingly and inevitably homogenous in their forms and practices. Orga...
Organizational Commitment
Two models of the factors leading to organizational commitment are compared: the member-based model, which holds that commitment originates in the actions and personal attribute...
Employee Volunteering
Employee volunteering is a topic of growing importance in workplaces around the globe. Likewise, research on employee volunteering has seen a marked increase over the past decad...
Noncoding RNA therapeutics — challenges and potential solutions
Therapeutic targeting of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), represents an attractive approach for the treatment of cancers, a...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1995
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 571-610
- Citations
- 12320
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331