<i>Planck</i> 2018 results

N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami , M. Ashdown , N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami , M. Ashdown , J. Aumont , C. Baccigalupi , M. Ballardini , A. J. Banday , R. B. Barreiro , N. Bartolo , S. Basak , Richard A. Battye , K. Benabed , J.-P. Bernard , M. Bersanelli , P. Bielewicz , J. J. Bock , J. R. Bond , J. Borrill , F. R. Bouchet , F. Boulanger , M. Bucher , C. Burigana , R. C. Butler , E. Calabrese , J.-F. Cardoso , Julien Carron , A. Challinor , H. C. Chiang , Jens Chluba , L. P. L. Colombo , C. Combet , D. Contreras , B. P. Crill , F. Cuttaia , P. de Bernardis , G. de Zotti , G. de Zotti , J.‐M. Delouis , Eleonora Di Valentino , J. M. Diego , J. M. Diego , M. Douspis , A. Ducout , X. Dupac , S. Dusini , G. Efstathiou , F. Elsner , T. A. Enßlin , H. K. Eriksen , Y. Fantaye , M. Farhang , J. Fergusson , R. Fernández-Cobos , F. Finelli⋆ , F. Forastieri , M. Frailis , A. A. Fraisse , E. Franceschi , A. Frolov , S. Galeotta , S. Galli , K. Ganga , R. T. Génova-Santos , M. Gerbino , T. Ghosh , J. González-Nuevo , K. M. Górski , S. Gratton , A. Gruppuso , J. E. Gudmundsson , J. Hamann , Will Handley , F. K. Hansen , D. Herranz , S. R. Hildebrandt , E. Hivon , Zhiqi Huang , A. H. Jaffe , W. C. Jones , A. Karakci , E. Keihänen , R. Keskitalo , K. Kiiveri , J. Kim , T. S. Kisner , L. Knox , N. Krachmalnicoff , M. Kunz , H. Kurki‐Suonio , G. Lagache , J.‐M. Lamarre , A. Lasenby , M. Lattanzi , C. R. Lawrence , M. Le Jeune , Pablo Lemos , J. Lesgourgues , F. Levrier , Antony Lewis , M. Liguori
2021 Astronomy and Astrophysics 1,470 citations

Abstract

In the original version, the bounds given in Eqs. (87a) and (87b) on the contribution to the early-time optical depth, (15,30), contained a numerical error in deriving the 95th percentile from the Monte Carlo samples. The corrected 95% upper bounds are: τ(15,30) &amp;lt; 0:018 (lowE, flat τ(15, 30), FlexKnot), (1) τ(15, 30) &amp;lt; 0:023 (lowE, flat knot, FlexKnot): (2) These bounds are a factor of 3 larger than the originally reported results. Consequently, the new bounds do not significantly improve upon previous results from Planck data presented in Millea &amp;amp; Bouchet (2018) as was stated, but are instead comparable. Equations (1) and (2) give results that are now similar to those of Heinrich &amp;amp; Hu (2021), who used the same Planck 2018 data to derive a 95% upper bound of 0.020 using the principal component analysis (PCA) model and uniform priors on the PCA mode amplitudes.

Keywords

PhysicsAstrophysicsPlanckAstronomy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

<i>Planck</i>2018 results

We report on the implications for cosmic inflation of the 2018 release of the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy measurements. The results are fully consistent ...

2019 Astronomy and Astrophysics 2200 citations

Publication Info

Year
2021
Type
article
Volume
652
Pages
C4-C4
Citations
1470
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1470
OpenAlex
0
Influential
1411
CrossRef

Cite This

N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown et al. (2021). <i>Planck</i> 2018 results. Astronomy and Astrophysics , 652 , C4-C4. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910e

Identifiers

DOI
10.1051/0004-6361/201833910e

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%