Abstract

Abstract Seventy‐two male subjects from lower technical schools were divided into groups of three and assigned to three conditions in which they expected to work together in competition with another group, to work together but independently of the other group, or did not anticipate to work together at all. Subjects who anticipated working together showed a more favorable attitude toward their group and its members than subjects who did not. Moreover, actual social interaction increased in‐group attractiveness. Intergroup competition led to a more differentiated leadership structure and a greater consensus about the distribution of influence in the group. Contrary to our predictions, intergroup competition produced no greater in‐group solidarity, nor any over‐evaluation of the group's product. Low influence persons felt comparatively more positive about their group even before they actually had the opportunity to work together. An attempt was made to relate this finding to the ordinal position of the low status figure, his affiliative tendencies under stress, and his greater social dependence.

Keywords

PsychologySocial psychologyAttractivenessCompetition (biology)SolidarityGroup (periodic table)Social groupPreferenceProduct (mathematics)MicroeconomicsEconomicsPolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1971
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
215-234
Citations
117
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

117
OpenAlex
1
Influential
63
CrossRef

Cite This

Jacob M. Rabbie, Gerard Wilkens (1971). Intergroup competition and its effect on intragroup and intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology , 1 (2) , 215-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010205

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/ejsp.2420010205

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%