Abstract
Pictures of common objects, coming slowly into focus, were viewed by adult observers. Recognition was delayed when subjects first viewed the pictures out of focus. The greater or more prolonged the initial blur, the slower the eventual recognition. Interference may be accounted for partly by the difficulty of rejecting incorrect hypotheses based on substandard cues.
Keywords
Focus (optics)Interference (communication)PsychologyCognitive psychologyVisual perceptionCommunicationArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePerceptionNeuroscienceTelecommunicationsPhysicsOptics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Object Detection Approach for Robot Grasp Detection
In this paper, we focus on the robot grasping problem with parallel grippers using image data. For this task, we propose and implement an end-to-end approach. In order to detect...
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Summary 1. Here, I present a new, multifunctional phylogenetics package, phytools, for the R statistical computing environment. 2. The focus of the package is on methods for phy...
The Moral Dimension
The authors argue that counseling psychologists will benefit from the development of conceptual frameworks that focus attention and consideration on the moral dimensions of psyc...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1964
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 3617
- Pages
- 424-425
- Citations
- 239
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
239
OpenAlex
Cite This
Jerome S. Bruner,
Mary C. Potter
(1964).
Interference in Visual Recognition.
Science
, 144
(3617)
, 424-425.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.144.3617.424
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1126/science.144.3617.424