Abstract

The independence of positive and negative affect has been heralded as a major and counterintuitive finding in the psychology of mood and emotion. Still, other findings support the older view that positive and negative fall at opposite ends of a single bipolar continuum. Independence versus bipolarity can be reconciled by considering (a) the activation dimension of affect, (b) random and systematic measurement error, and (c) how items are selected to achieve an appropriate test of bipolarity. In 3 studies of self-reported current affect, random and systematic error were controlled through multiformat measurement and confirmatory factor analysis. Valence was found to be independent of activation, positive affect the bipolar opposite of negative affect, and deactivation the bipolar opposite of activation. The dimensions underlying D. Watson, L. A. Clark, and A. Tellegen's (1988) Positive and Negative Affect schedule were accounted for by the valence and activation dimensions. A consensus on a descriptive structure of current affect is at hand—if we can only agree on what the structure is. The psychology of mood, emotion, and affect needs a consensual structure and is tantalizingly close to achieving one. Among the remaining disagreements, the most puzzling and persistent is bipolarity versus independence. Is positive affect the bipolar opposite of, or is it independent of, negative affect? Are happiness and sadness two ends of one continuum, or separate entities, like apples and oranges? A resolution to this puzzle is needed to answer questions about the number of dimensions of affect, how affect should be measured, and the underlying processes involved. Despite repeated attempts, a solution to this puzzle remains elusive, and a long-simmering debate has recently flared up. Much is at stake in this debate, for important lines of research have arisen on these opposing assumptions. This article offers conceptual and empirical analyses aimed at resolving the dispute.

Keywords

PsychologyAffect (linguistics)Social psychologyIndependence (probability theory)Cognitive psychologyCommunication

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1998
Type
article
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
967-984
Citations
1312
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1312
OpenAlex

Cite This

Lisa Feldman Barrett, James A. Russell (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 74 (4) , 967-984. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967