Identifying Otolaryngology Systematic Review Research Gaps

Abstract

The representation of otolaryngologic conditions in CDSR correlates poorly with DALY metrics. The results of this study may guide future research prioritization and allocation of funds.

Keywords

OtorhinolaryngologySystematic reviewMedicineMedical physicsComputer scienceMEDLINEPolitical scienceSurgery

MeSH Terms

HumansCost of IllnessDatabasesFactualOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSystematic Reviews as Topic

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Protection for Otolaryngologic Surgery in the COVID‐19 Pandemic

Antonia Lagos , Phoebe H. Ramos , Tomás Andrade

Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has placed unprecedented challenges on the world and the medical community. It is transmitted through droplets, contact, the fe...

2020 OTO Open 13 citations

Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours

William C.W. Wong , Catherine S. K. Cheung , Graham Hart

Abstract Background Systematic reviews based on the critical appraisal of observational and analytic studies on HIV prevalence and risk factors for HIV transmission among men ha...

2008 Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 262 citations

'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review

Rebecca Armstrong , Belinda J. Hall , Jodie Doyle +1 more

Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quan...

2011 Journal of Public Health 1207 citations

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

Anthony Chauvin , Philippe Ravaud , David Moher +13 more

Abstract Background The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy in id...

2019 BMC Medicine 74 citations

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page , Joanne E. McKenzie , Patrick M. Bossuyt +23 more

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...

2021 International Journal of Surgery 10623 citations

Publication Info

Year: 2014
Type: article
Volume: 141
Issue: 1
Pages: 67-67
Citations: 10
Access: Closed

External Links

Download PDF (Free) View on DOI.org PubMed Semantic Scholar

Social Impact

Altmetric

Identifying Otolaryngology Systematic Review Research Gaps

PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

OpenAlex

Influential

CrossRef

Cite This

APA Style

                            
                                
                                    Hannah Pederson, 
                                
                                    Tyler S. Okland, 
                                
                                    Lindsay N. Boyers
                                
                                et al.
                            
                            (2014). 
                            Identifying Otolaryngology Systematic Review Research Gaps. 
                            JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
                            , 141
                            (1)
                            , 67-67.
                            https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2700
                        

Identifiers

DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2700
PMID: 25356671

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%