Abstract

Systematic reviews use a transparent and systematic process to define a research question, search for studies, assess their quality and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively.A crucial step in the systematic review process is to thoroughly define the scope of the research question.This requires an understanding of existing literature, including gaps and uncertainties, clarification of definitions related to the research question and an understanding of the way in which these are conceptualized within existing literature.This information is often acquired in an ad hoc fashion, however a useful and increasingly popular way to collect and organize important background information and develop a picture of the existing evidence base is to conduct a scoping review.Such reviews may be published as a research outcome in their own right and are appealing since they produce a broad map of the evidence that, if sufficiently transparent and widely available via publication, can be used by many and for applications beyond the authors originally intended purpose.Scoping reviews can inform a systematic review, particularly one with a very broad topic scope, such as those edited by the Cochrane Public Health Group.

Keywords

Scope (computer science)Systematic reviewProcess (computing)Data scienceGrey literatureComputer scienceManagement scienceMEDLINEEngineering ethicsKnowledge managementPsychologyMedicinePolitical scienceEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2011
Type
review
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
147-150
Citations
1207
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1207
OpenAlex

Cite This

Rebecca Armstrong, Belinda J. Hall, Jodie Doyle et al. (2011). 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health , 33 (1) , 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/pubmed/fdr015