Abstract

The location of and threats to biodiversity are distributed unevenly, so prioritization is essential to minimize biodiversity loss. To address this need, biodiversity conservation organizations have proposed nine templates of global priorities over the past decade. Here, we review the concepts, methods, results, impacts, and challenges of these prioritizations of conservation practice within the theoretical irreplaceability/vulnerability framework of systematic conservation planning. Most of the templates prioritize highly irreplaceable regions; some are reactive (prioritizing high vulnerability), and others are proactive (prioritizing low vulnerability). We hope this synthesis improves understanding of these prioritization approaches and that it results in more efficient allocation of geographically flexible conservation funding.

Keywords

PrioritizationVulnerability (computing)BiodiversityBiodiversity conservationEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningVulnerability assessmentBusinessGeographyComputer scienceBiologyEcologyProcess managementEnvironmental sciencePsychological resilienceComputer security

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
review
Volume
313
Issue
5783
Pages
58-61
Citations
2287
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2287
OpenAlex

Cite This

Thomas M. Brooks, R. A. Mittermeier, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca et al. (2006). Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities. Science , 313 (5783) , 58-61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609

Identifiers

DOI
10.1126/science.1127609