Abstract
The analysis of patient selection in clinical trials showed that a minority of centres accounted for most of the patients recruited. Those are not only the most productive (more patients randomized) but also the more efficient (better quality of screening process).
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.
The problem of generalisability in randomised clinical trials was highlighted by studies that entered only 10-14% of screened patients. To determine the magnitude and source of ...
Designing Medical and Educational Intervention Studies: A review of some alternatives to conventional randomized controlled trials
The advantages and limitations of RCT designs are discussed, and a range of alternative designs for medical and educational intervention studies considered. Designs selected are...
Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis
Trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses may be prone to bias associated with post-randomization exclusion of patients. Wherever possible, the level of such exclusions shou...
Quality assurance of the EORTC 26981/22981; NCIC CE3 intergroup trial on radiotherapy with or without temozolomide for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: the individual case review
The phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trail Group (NCIC) Intergroup trial ...
Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic Review
Recruitment strategies that focus on increasing potential participants' awareness of the health problem being studied, its potential impact on their health, and their engagement...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1998
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 521-3
- Citations
- 2
- Access
- Closed