Abstract
Defines involvement as a motivational state induced by an association between an activated attitude and the self-concept. Integration of the available research su~ests that the effects of involvement on attitude change depended on the aspect of message recipients' self-concept that was activated to create involvement: (a) their enduring values (value-relevant involvement), (b) their ability to attain desirable outcomes (outcome-relevant involvement), or (e) the impression they make on others (impression-relevant involvement). Findings showed that (a) with value-relevant involvement, high-involvement subjects were less persuaded than low-involvement subjects; (b) with outcome-relevant involvement, high-involvement subjects were more persuaded than low-involvement subjects by strong arguments and (somewhat inconsistently) less persuaded by weak arguments; and (c) with impression-relevant involvement, high-involvement subjects were slightly less persuaded than lowinvolvement subjects. To understand the conditions under which people are persuaded by others, researchers often invoked the concept of involvement. Although this construct was popular prior to M. Sherifand Cantril's (1947) work (see A. G. Greenwald's, 1982, review), their proposal that highly involving attitudes be regarded as components of the self-concept or was seminal to theory about involvement's impact on attitude change. According to M. Sherif and Cantril (1947), such attitudes have the characteristic of belonging to me, as being part of me, as psychologically experienced (p. 93). M. Sherif, C. W. Sherif, and their colleagues developed the implications of involvement (which they often called ego involvement) for persuasion by giving it a major role in their social judgment-involvement approach, a theory of attitude change developed in the 1950s and early 1960s (Hovland, Harvey, & Sherif, 1957; C. W. Sherif, Sherif, & Nebergall, 1965; M. Sherif & Hovland, 1961). During this same period, Zimbardo (1960) introduced the concept of response involvement in order to predict attitude change in a social influence setting. In more
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
In Experiment 1, subjects read a persuasive message from a likable or unlikable communicator who presented six or two arguments concerning one of two topics. High response invol...
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Although the mere exposure effect has been researched widely, surprisingly little is known about the attitudinal and cognitive effects of message repetition. It was hypothesized...
Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation.
Administered questionnaires to 291 scientists working in research and development laboratories. Results of a factor analysis indicate that job-involvement attitudes, higher orde...
Self-Perception and Attitude-Behavior Consistency
An experiment tested the hypothesis that the degree to which an attitude is inferred from past behaviors toward an object is a determinant of attitude-behavior consistency. Subj...
Some effects of time and thought on attitude polarization.
Three experiments were performed to examine the effects of thought on attitude change. It was predicted that (a) thought produces a change in attitude so as to make it more extr...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1989
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-314
- Citations
- 929
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290