Abstract

Abstract The discriminant validity of perceptions of organizational politics, organizational support, and procedural and distributive justice was examined as the distinctions between these variables have been blurred in past research. Results from a sample of 418 full‐time employees provided evidence of discriminant validity for these variables. First, structural equation modelling was used to isolate the best structural representation of these four variables. Then, six theoretically relevant predictors (i.e., leader–member exchange, centralization, formalization, co‐worker cooperation, role conflict, and locus of control) were examined in an effort to provide further conceptual separation. Five of the six antecedents distinguished among politics, justice, and support. Suggestions for additional research that can shed light on the distinctions and similarities of these variables are offered based on the results of this study. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

PsychologyOrganizational justiceSocial psychologyPoliticsEconomic JusticePerceptionSample (material)Structural equation modelingDiscriminant validityDistributive justiceProcedural justiceLocus of controlOrganizational commitmentPolitical scienceMicroeconomicsEconomicsPsychometricsStatisticsLaw

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2001
Type
article
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
347-366
Citations
356
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

356
OpenAlex

Cite This

Martha C. Andrews, K. Michele Kacmar (2001). Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 22 (4) , 347-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.92

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/job.92