Abstract
This article critiques the assumptions about the nature and meaning of disability advanced in social‐psychological writing, suggests the origins of these assumptions, and proposes a return to a Lewinian/minority‐group analysis of the situation of people with disabilities. It concludes by placing the articles in this issue of the Journal of Social Issues in context and by presenting questions in need of further exploration.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Reconsidering the Stigma of Physical Disability: Wheelchair Use and Public Kindness
This article reexamines the stigma of physical disability using the empirical example of wheelchair users' treatment in public places. It draws upon conversational interviews wi...
Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders
Is the emotionally disturbed person a victim of forces beyond his awareness, over which he has no control? This is the belief on which neuropsychiatry, psychoanalysis, and behav...
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: con...
Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning.
Many of the perceptual variables used in industrial/organizational psychology assess the meaning that work environment attributes have for individuals (e.g., the ambiguity of ro...
A Structural Theory of Personal Consistency
Based on a structural model of self-conception, this paper proposes a theory of personal consistency. This theory emphasizes certain parameters from distributions of identities ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1988
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-21
- Citations
- 524
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02045.x