Abstract

Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.

Keywords

Content analysisSummative assessmentCoding (social sciences)Content (measure theory)Qualitative researchComputer scienceMeaning (existential)TrustworthinessQualitative analysisContext (archaeology)Interpretation (philosophy)PsychologySocial psychologyMathematics educationFormative assessmentMathematicsSociologyStatisticsSocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
1277-1288
Citations
41213
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

41213
OpenAlex

Cite This

Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E. Shannon (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research , 15 (9) , 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1049732305276687