Abstract
Acknowledgements. Preface. 1. Introduction. 1.1 Why randomize clusters? 1.2 What is the impact of cluster randomization on the design and analysis of a trial? 1.3 Quantifying the effect of clustering. 1.4 Randomized versus non-randomized comparisons. 1.5 The unit of inference. 1.6 Terminology: what's in a name? 2. The historical development of cluster randomized trials. 2.1 Randomized trials before 1950. 2.2 Cluster randomized trials between 1950 and 1978. 2.3 Cluster randomized trails since 1978. 3. Issues arising in the planning of cluster randomization trials. 3.1 Selecting interventions. 3.2 Setting eligibility criteria. 3.3 Measuring subject response. 3.4 The most commonly used experimental designs. 3.5 Factorial and crossover designs. 3.6 Selecting an experimental design. 3.7 The importance of cluster-level replication. 3.8 Strategies for conducting successful trials. 4. The role of informed consent and other ethical issues. 4.1 The risk of harm. 4.2 Informed consent. 4.3 Subject blindness and informed consent. 4.4 Randomized consent designs. 4.5 Ethical issues and trial monitoring. 5. Sample size estimation for cluster randomization designs. 5.1 General issues of sample size estimation. 5.2 The completely randomized design. 5.3 The matched-pair design. 5.4 The stratified design. 5.5 Issues involving losses to follow-up. 5.6 Strategies for achieving desired power. 6. Analysis of binary outcomes. 6.1 Selecting the unit of analysis. 6.2 The completely randomized design. 6.3 The matched-pair design. 6.4 The stratified design. 7. Analysis of quantitative outcomes. 7.1 The completely randomized design. 7.2 The matched-pair design. 7.3 The stratified design. 8. Analysis of count, time to event and categorical outcomes. 8.1 Count and time to event data. 8.2 Categorical data. 9. Reporting of cluster randomization trials. 9.1 Reporting of study design. 9.2 Reporting of study results. References. Index.
Keywords
Related Publications
Designing Medical and Educational Intervention Studies: A review of some alternatives to conventional randomized controlled trials
The advantages and limitations of RCT designs are discussed, and a range of alternative designs for medical and educational intervention studies considered. Designs selected are...
Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, which includes a checklist and a flow diagram, is a guideline developed to help authors improve the reporting...
Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research
"Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research." Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(456), p. 1529
Issues in the meta‐analysis of cluster randomized trials
Abstract Meta‐analyses involving the synthesis of evidence from cluster randomization trials are being increasingly reported. These analyses raise challenging methodologic issue...
Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized Trials
The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, including a checklist and a flow diagram, was developed to help authors improve their reporting of randomized...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- book
- Citations
- 1239
- Access
- Closed