Abstract

Decision tree classifiers are regarded to be a standout of the most well-known methods to data classification representation of classifiers. Different researchers from various fields and backgrounds have considered the problem of extending a decision tree from available data, such as machine study, pattern recognition, and statistics. In various fields such as medical disease analysis, text classification, user smartphone classification, images, and many more the employment of Decision tree classifiers has been proposed in many ways. This paper provides a detailed approach to the decision trees. Furthermore, paper specifics, such as algorithms/approaches used, datasets, and outcomes achieved, are evaluated and outlined comprehensively. In addition, all of the approaches analyzed were discussed to illustrate the themes of the authors and identify the most accurate classifiers. As a result, the uses of different types of datasets are discussed and their findings are analyzed.

Keywords

Decision treeComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceID3 algorithmDecision tree learningIncremental decision treeRepresentation (politics)Tree (set theory)Statistical classificationData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Bagging, boosting, and C4.S

Breiman's bagging and Freund and Schapire's boosting are recent methods for improving the predictive power of classifier learning systems. Both form a set of classifiers that ar...

1996 National Conference on Artificial Int... 1262 citations

Publication Info

Year
2021
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
01
Pages
20-28
Citations
1629
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1629
OpenAlex
36
Influential
1308
CrossRef

Cite This

Bahzad Charbuty, Adnan Mohsin Abdulazeez (2021). Classification Based on Decision Tree Algorithm for Machine Learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends , 2 (01) , 20-28. https://doi.org/10.38094/jastt20165

Identifiers

DOI
10.38094/jastt20165

Data Quality

Data completeness: 81%