Abstract

Breiman's bagging and Freund and Schapire's boosting are recent methods for improving the predictive power of classifier learning systems. Both form a set of classifiers that are combined by voting, bagging by generating replicated bootstrap samples of the data, and boosting by adjusting the weights of training instances. This paper reports results of applying both techniques to a system that learns decision trees and testing on a representative collection of datasets. While both approaches substantially improve predictive accuracy, boosting shows the greater benefit. On the other hand, boosting also produces severe degradation on some datasets. A small change to the way that boosting combines the votes of learned classifiers reduces this downside and also leads to slightly better results on most of the datasets considered.

Keywords

Boosting (machine learning)Machine learningArtificial intelligenceGradient boostingComputer scienceDecision treeClassifier (UML)Training setVotingData miningPattern recognition (psychology)Random forest

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Pages
725-730
Citations
1262
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

1262
OpenAlex

Cite This

J. R. Quinlan (1996). Bagging, boosting, and C4.S. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 725-730.