Abstract
Abstract Aim This study was aimed at systematically reviewing evidence of the association between breastfeeding and performance in intelligence tests. Methods Two independent searches were carried out using Medline, LILACS , SCIELO and Web of Science. Studies restricted to infants and those where estimates were not adjusted for stimulation or interaction at home were excluded. Fixed‐ and random‐effects models were used to pool the effect estimates, and a random‐effects regression was used to assess potential sources of heterogeneity. Results We included 17 studies with 18 estimates of the relationship between breastfeeding and performance in intelligence tests. In a random‐effects model, breastfed subjects achieved a higher IQ [mean difference: 3.44 points (95% confidence interval: 2.30; 4.58)]. We found no evidence of publication bias. Studies that controlled for maternal IQ showed a smaller benefit from breastfeeding [mean difference 2.62 points (95% confidence interval: 1.25; 3.98)]. In the meta‐regression, none of the study characteristics explained the heterogeneity among the studies. Conclusion Breastfeeding is related to improved performance in intelligence tests. A positive effect of breastfeeding on cognition was also observed in a randomised trial. This suggests that the association is causal.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Long‐term consequences of breastfeeding on cholesterol, obesity, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract Aim To systematically review the evidence on the associations between breastfeeding and overweight/obesity, blood pressure, total cholesterol and type 2 diabetes. Metho...
Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on child growth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract Aim To update a previous systematic review and meta‐analyses about the effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on child growth. Methods Studies evaluating the e...
Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
The currently available meta-analytic methods for correlations have restrictive assumptions. The fixed-effects methods assume equal population correlations and exhibit poor perf...
Treatment-effect estimates adjusted for small-study effects via a limit meta-analysis
Statistical heterogeneity and small-study effects are 2 major issues affecting the validity of meta-analysis. In this article, we introduce the concept of a limit meta-analysis,...
Global Prevalence of Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Condition or Long COVID: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Abstract Background This study aims to examine the worldwide prevalence of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Met...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2015
- Type
- review
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- S467
- Pages
- 14-19
- Citations
- 717
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/apa.13139