Abstract
A Bayesian approach to model selection for structural equation models is outlined. This enables us to compare individual models, nested or non-nested, and also to search through the (perhaps vast) set of possible models for the best ones. The approach selects several models rather than just one, when appropriate, and so enables us to take account, both informally and formally, of uncertainty about model structure when making inferences about quantities of interest. The approach tends to select simpler models than strategies based on multiple P-value-based tests. It may thus help to overcome the criticism of structural
Keywords
Related Publications
Bayes Factors
Abstract In a 1935 paper and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece wa...
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
In this paper, we develop a classical approach to model selection. Using the Kullback-Leibler Information Criterion to measure the closeness of a model to the truth, we propose ...
A tetrad test for causal indicators.
The authors propose a confirmatory tetrad analysis test to distinguish causal from effect indicators in structural equation models. The test uses "nested" vanishing tetrads that...
Testing Mediational Models With Longitudinal Data: Questions and Tips in the Use of Structural Equation Modeling.
R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny (1986; see record 1987-13085-001) provided clarion conceptual and methodological guidelines for testing mediational models with cross-sectional data....
Performance-Based Selection of Likelihood Models for Phylogeny Estimation
Phylogenetic estimation has largely come to rely on explicitly model-based methods. This approach requires that a model be chosen and that that choice be justified. To date, jus...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1992
- Type
- article
- Citations
- 356
- Access
- Closed