Abstract
Abstract The propensity score is a subject's probability of treatment, conditional on observed baseline covariates. Conditional on the true propensity score, treated and untreated subjects have similar distributions of observed baseline covariates. Propensity‐score matching is a popular method of using the propensity score in the medical literature. Using this approach, matched sets of treated and untreated subjects with similar values of the propensity score are formed. Inferences about treatment effect made using propensity‐score matching are valid only if, in the matched sample, treated and untreated subjects have similar distributions of measured baseline covariates. In this paper we discuss the following methods for assessing whether the propensity score model has been correctly specified: comparing means and prevalences of baseline characteristics using standardized differences; ratios comparing the variance of continuous covariates between treated and untreated subjects; comparison of higher order moments and interactions; five‐number summaries; and graphical methods such as quantile–quantile plots, side‐by‐side boxplots, and non‐parametric density plots for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups. We describe methods to determine the sampling distribution of the standardized difference when the true standardized difference is equal to zero, thereby allowing one to determine the range of standardized differences that are plausible with the propensity score model having been correctly specified. We highlight the limitations of some previously used methods for assessing the adequacy of the specification of the propensity‐score model. In particular, methods based on comparing the distribution of the estimated propensity score between treated and untreated subjects are uninformative. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression
Abstract We propose a method to decompose the changes in the wage distribution over a period of time in several factors contributing to those changes. The method is based on the...
Influence of disease‐modifying therapy on radiographic outcome in inflammatory polyarthritis at five years: Results from a large observational inception study
Abstract Objective To determine the effect of early treatment with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in reducing radiographic progression over a 5‐year period in pa...
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine
Abstract The clinical performance of a laboratory test can be described in terms of diagnostic accuracy, or the ability to correctly classify subjects into clinically relevant s...
Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous t-PA Therapy for Ischemic Stroke
Background and Purpose We sought to identify variables associated with intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive tissue plasminogen activator (...
Democracy Does Cause Growth
We provide evidence that democracy has a positive effect on GDP per capita. Our dynamic panel strategy controls for country fixed effects and the rich dynamics of GDP, which oth...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2009
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 3083-3107
- Citations
- 5852
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1002/sim.3697