Abstract

After developing a conceptual analysis of consumer valuation of multiple risks, we explore both economic and cognitive hypotheses regarding individual risk-taking. Using a sample of over 1,500 consumers, our study ascertains risk-dollar tradeoffs for the risks associated with using an insecticide and a toilet bowl cleaner. We observe the expected positive valuation of risk reductions and find empirical support for a diminishing in the valuation of risk reduction as the extent of the risk reduction increases. We also find evidence of certainty premiums for the total elimination of one risk, but no strong evidence of additional certainty premiums for the elimination of multiple risks. Strong reference risk effects are evident, as increases in risk were valued much more greatly than were decreases.

Keywords

Valuation (finance)CertaintyRationalityLiberian dollarEconomicsActuarial scienceMicroeconomicsBusinessFinance

Related Publications

The Capital Structure Puzzle

Stewart C. Myers President of American Finance Association 1983 This paper's title is intended to remind you of Fischer Black's well-known note on “The Dividend Puzzle,” which h...

1984 The Journal of Finance 7515 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
465-465
Citations
338
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

338
OpenAlex

Cite This

W. Kip Viscusi, Wesley A. Magat, Joel Huber (1987). An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks. The RAND Journal of Economics , 18 (4) , 465-465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555636

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/2555636