Abstract

Most phylogenetically based statistical methods for the analysis of quantitative or continuously varying phenotypic traits assume that variation within species is absent or at least negligible, which is unrealistic for many traits. Within-species variation has several components. Differences among populations of the same species may represent either phylogenetic divergence or direct effects of environmental factors that differ among populations (phenotypic plasticity). Within-population variation also contributes to within-species variation and includes sampling variation, instrument-related error, low repeatability caused by fluctuations in behavioral or physiological state, variation related to age, sex, season, or time of day, and individual variation within such categories. Here we develop techniques for analyzing phylogenetically correlated data to include within-species variation, or "measurement error" as it is often termed in the statistical literature. We derive methods for (i) univariate analyses, including measurement of "phylogenetic signal," (ii) correlation and principal components analysis for multiple traits, (iii) multiple regression, and (iv) inference of "functional relations," such as reduced major axis (RMA) regression. The methods are capable of incorporating measurement error that differs for each data point (mean value for a species or population), but they can be modified for special cases in which less is known about measurement error (e.g., when one is willing to assume something about the ratio of measurement error in two traits). We show that failure to incorporate measurement error can lead to both biased and imprecise (unduly uncertain) parameter estimates. Even previous methods that are thought to account for measurement error, such as conventional RMA regression, can be improved by explicitly incorporating measurement error and phylogenetic correlation. We illustrate these methods with examples and simulations and provide Matlab programs.

Keywords

BiologyPhylogenetic treeVariation (astronomy)Phylogenetic comparative methodsStatisticsEvolutionary biologyMathematicsGenetics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Phylogenies and the Comparative Method

Comparative studies of the relationship between two phenotypes, or between a phenotype and an environment, are frequently carried out by invalid statistical methods. Most regres...

1985 The American Naturalist 9916 citations

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
252-270
Citations
488
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

488
OpenAlex

Cite This

Anthony R. Ives, Peter Midford, Theodore Garland (2007). Within-Species Variation and Measurement Error in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods. Systematic Biology , 56 (2) , 252-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701313830

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/10635150701313830