Abstract
The currently dominant psychological model of responsibility attribution is criticized and expanded upon from a sociological perspective. It is argued that responsibility judgments entail consideration of both what the actor did and what the actor was supposed to do: i.e., both physical deeds and social roles. Including roles in a responsibility attribution model provides: (I) a coherent account of alternative meanings of responsibility itself; (2) a social psychological approach that is congruent with rules actually followed in adult sanctioning judgments; and (3) an opportunity for social psychologists to study the crucial dichotomy of authoritative versus subordinate roles. Roles are interpreted attributionally as normative contexts within which actions are evaluated, rather than as external or situational constraints on action. In general, it is suggested that accepting a role demand as normative may evoke a purposive attribution process, labeled here as ' 'motive grammar''; rejecting the role demand may be accompanied by a causal attribution process, consequence grammar. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research possibilities.
Keywords
AttributionPsychologySocial psychologySocial responsibilityMoral responsibilityEpistemologyPublic relations
Related Publications
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether altering attributions for failure would enable learned helpless children to deal more effectively with failure in an ex...
Development of Children's Performance-related Judgments
STIPEK, DEBORAH J., and HOFFMAN, JOEL M. Development of Children's Performance-related Judgments. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 51, 912-914. Children aged 3-8 were asked to make caus...
How to Make Cognitive Illusions Disappear: Beyond “Heuristics and Biases”
Most so-called "errors" in probabilistic reasoning are in fact not violations of probability theory. Examples of such "errors" include overconfidence bias, conjunction fallacy, ...
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
There are two broad intellectual streams in the description and explanation of social action. One, characteristic of the work of most sociologists, sees the actor as socialized ...
How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ?
From the beginning of the work on the achievement motive (McClelland, Atkinson, Clark, & Lowell, 1953), it has been apparent that motive dispositions as coded in imaginative tho...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1978
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-316
- Citations
- 274
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
274
OpenAlex
12
Influential
200
CrossRef
Cite This
V. Lee Hamilton
(1978).
Who is Responsible? Toward a Social Psychology of Responsibility Attribution.
Social Psychology
, 41
(4)
, 316-316.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3033584
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/3033584