Abstract

Much animal research into potential treatments for humans is wasted because it is poorly conducted and not evaluated through systematic reviews

Keywords

Data scienceComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicineBioinformaticsBiology

MeSH Terms

Animal ExperimentationAnimalsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicHumansQuality ControlReview Literature as Topic

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Column Editor

Andrew Booth

Will health librarians and related information workers ever work together to create an international network, such as the Cochrane Collaboration, dedicated to the purpose of pre...

2001 Health Information & Libraries Journal 15 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
review
Volume
328
Issue
7438
Pages
514-517
Citations
494
Access
Closed

External Links

Download PDF (Free) View on DOI.org PubMed Semantic Scholar

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

494
OpenAlex
10
Influential
387
CrossRef

Cite This

Pandora Pound, Shah Ebrahim, Peter Sandercock et al. (2004). Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?. BMJ , 328 (7438) , 514-517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514
PMID
14988196
PMCID
PMC351856

Data Quality

Data completeness: 86%