Abstract

As a patient I have been quite taken aback that whenever I’ve seen doctors recently they have called me by my first name while introducing themselves by their title and surname. I find it distinctly unhelpful in my interaction with another adult to be addressed like a child by their teacher when the experience of illness is already making me feel unsettled, vulnerable, and anxious.1 Whenever I have raised this matter of unequal address during a consultation, it has been met with surprise and the mention of wanting to make me feel at ease. In Germany it would be unthinkable for a doctor to introduce himself as Dr Schmidt while summoning a patient from the waiting room by calling out “Helmut” or “Angela.” I am curious as to whether there have been any recent guidelines to encourage this practice in Britain, why it seems to be the norm, and why do so few people question, let alone challenge, it? This is occurring at the same time as there is so much talked and written about patients’ dignity, the doctor-patient partnership, respect, and empowerment.

Keywords

Computer scienceWorld Wide WebInformation retrievalData science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Ethnomethodology's Program

gets reintroduced to me in a recurrent episode at the annual meetings of the American Sociological Association. I'm waiting for the elevator. The doors open. Oh, Hi Hal! Hi. I w...

1996 Social Psychology Quarterly 680 citations

Publication Info

Year
2008
Type
letter
Volume
337
Issue
jul15 2
Pages
a687-a687
Citations
28
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

28
OpenAlex

Cite This

Anke Medrington (2008). What's in a name?. BMJ , 337 (jul15 2) , a687-a687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a687

Identifiers

DOI
10.1136/bmj.a687