Keywords
TypologySystematic reviewManagement scienceHealth careMedical literatureEvidence-based medicineEngineering ethicsInclusion (mineral)MEDLINEPsychologyComputer scienceData scienceMedicineAlternative medicineSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceEngineering
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
BackgroundScoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic re...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2018
- Type
- letter
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-5
- Citations
- 1011
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
1011
OpenAlex
Cite This
Zachary Munn,
Cindy Stern,
Edoardo Aromataris
et al.
(2018).
What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, 18
(1)
, 5-5.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4