Abstract

Omission of important confounders from the propensity score leads to residual confounding in estimates of treatment effect. However, tests of GOF and discrimination do not provide information to detect missing confounders in propensity score models. Our findings suggest that it may not be necessary to compute GOF statistics or model discrimination when developing propensity score models.

Keywords

Propensity score matchingConfoundingStatisticsMedicineObservational studyStatisticLogistic regressionGoodness of fitEconometricsMathematics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
227-238
Citations
93
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

93
OpenAlex

Cite This

Sherry Weitzen, Kate L. Lapane, Alicia Y. Toledano et al. (2004). Weaknesses of goodness-of-fit tests for evaluating propensity score models: the case of the omitted confounder. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety , 14 (4) , 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.986

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/pds.986