WAS IT THERE? DEALING WITH IMPERFECT DETECTION FOR SPECIES PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATA<sup>†</sup>

2005 Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 141 citations

Abstract

Summary Species presence/absence surveys are commonly used in monitoring programs, metapopulation studies and habitat modelling, yet they can never be used to confirm that a species is absent from a location. Was the species there but not detected, or was the species genuinely absent? Not accounting for imperfect detection of the species leads to misleading conclusions about the status of the population under study. Here some recent modelling developments are reviewed that explicitly allow for the detection process, enabling unbiased estimation of occupancy, colonization and local extinction probabilities. The methods are illustrated with a simple analysis of presence/absence data collected on larvae and metamorphs of tiger salamander ( Ambystoma tigrinum ) in 2000 and 2001 from Minnesota farm ponds, which highlights that misleading conclusions can result from naive analyses that do not explicitly account for imperfect detection.

Keywords

Tiger salamanderMetapopulationOccupancyImperfectSalamanderExtinction (optical mineralogy)PopulationEcologyHabitatStatisticsBiologyGeographyEconometricsComputer scienceLarvaMathematicsDemographyBiological dispersal

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
65-74
Citations
141
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

141
OpenAlex

Cite This

Darryl I. MacKenzie (2005). WAS IT THERE? DEALING WITH IMPERFECT DETECTION FOR SPECIES PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATA<sup>†</sup>. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics , 47 (1) , 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.00372.x

Identifiers

DOI
10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.00372.x