Abstract

The count versus METs relationship for accelerometry was found to be dependent on the type of activity performed, which may be due to the inability of accelerometers to detect increased energy cost from upper body movement, load carriage, or changes in surface or terrain. This may introduce error in attempts to use accelerometry to assess point estimates of physical activity energy expenditure in free-living situations.

Keywords

AccelerometerPedometerEnergy expenditureMetabolic equivalentPhysical activityPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePhysical therapyEnvironmental scienceComputer science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
32
Issue
Supplement
Pages
S442-S449
Citations
755
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

755
OpenAlex

Cite This

D. L. Hendelman, Kelly J. Miller, C.D. Baggett et al. (2000). Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise , 32 (Supplement) , S442-S449. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200009001-00002

Identifiers

DOI
10.1097/00005768-200009001-00002