Abstract

The authors attempted to catalog the use of procedures to impute missing data in the epidemiologic literature and to determine the degree to which imputed results differed in practice from unimputed results. The full text of articles published in 2005 and 2006 in four leading epidemiologic journals was searched for the text imput. Sixteen articles utilizing multiple imputation, inverse probability weighting, or the expectation-maximization algorithm to impute missing data were found. The small number of relevant manuscripts and diversity of detail provided precluded systematic analysis of the use of imputation procedures. To form a bridge between current and future practice, the authors suggest details that should be included in articles that utilize these procedures.

Keywords

Imputation (statistics)Missing dataInverse probability weightingWeightingStatisticsComputer scienceMedicineInformation retrievalMathematicsEstimator

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys

Tables and Figures. Glossary. 1. Introduction. 1.1 Overview. 1.2 Examples of Surveys with Nonresponse. 1.3 Properly Handling Nonresponse. 1.4 Single Imputation. 1.5 Multiple Imp...

1987 Wiley series in probability and stati... 19880 citations

Publication Info

Year
2008
Type
review
Volume
168
Issue
4
Pages
355-357
Citations
229
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

229
OpenAlex

Cite This

Mark A. Klebanoff, Stephen R. Cole (2008). Use of Multiple Imputation in the Epidemiologic Literature. American Journal of Epidemiology , 168 (4) , 355-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn071

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/aje/kwn071