Abstract
Two check lists are used routinely in the statistical assessment of manuscripts submitted to the "BMJ." One is for papers of a general nature and the other specifically for reports on clinical trials. Each check list includes questions on the design, conduct, analysis, and presentation of studies, and answers to these contribute to the overall statistical evaluation. Only a small proportion of submitted papers are assessed statistically, and these are selected at the refereeing or editorial stage. Examination of the use of the check lists showed that most papers contained statistical failings, many of which could easily be remedied. It is recommended that the check lists should be used by statistical referees, editorial staff, and authors and also during the design stage of studies.
Keywords
Presentation (obstetrics)Check ListStatistical analysisComputer scienceInformation retrievalMedicineStatisticsLibrary scienceMathematicsSurgery
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the <i>Australian Veterinary Journal</i>
SUMMARY One hundred and thirty‐three papers (80 Original Articles and 53 Short Contributions) of 279 papers in 23 consecutive issues of the Australian Veterinary Journal were ex...
Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement
This summary corresponds to the translation into Spanish of the Special Communication published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in August 1996, along with the...
Comparability and Sensitivity of Set 2 (Lists E, F, and G) of the Depression Adjective Check Lists
To test the comparability of Set 2 (Lists E, F, and G) of the Depression Adjective Check Lists (DACL), 74 Ss who participated in a 1-wk. sensitivity group conference were given ...
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
Narrative reviews are the commonest type of articles in the medical literature. However, unlike systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCT) articles, for which for...
Reporting of occupational and environmental research: use and misuse of statistical and epidemiological methods
OBJECTIVES To report some of the most serious omissions and errors which may occur in papers submitted to Occupational and Environmental Medicine , and to give guidelines on the...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 6523
- Pages
- 810-812
- Citations
- 139
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
139
OpenAlex
Cite This
Martin J. Gardner,
David Machin,
Moray J. Campbell
(1986).
Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies..
BMJ
, 292
(6523)
, 810-812.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810