Abstract

Carbon sequestration strategies highlight tree plantations without considering their full environmental consequences. We combined field research, synthesis of more than 600 observations, and climate and economic modeling to document substantial losses in stream flow, and increased soil salinization and acidification, with afforestation. Plantations decreased stream flow by 227 millimeters per year globally (52%), with 13% of streams drying completely for at least 1 year. Regional modeling of U.S. plantation scenarios suggests that climate feedbacks are unlikely to offset such water losses and could exacerbate them. Plantations can help control groundwater recharge and upwelling but reduce stream flow and salinize and acidify some soils.

Keywords

Environmental scienceGroundwater rechargeCarbon sequestrationAfforestationSTREAMSHydrology (agriculture)Perennial streamGroundwaterSoil waterAgroforestryAquiferSoil scienceCarbon dioxideGeologyEcology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2005
Type
article
Volume
310
Issue
5756
Pages
1944-1947
Citations
1301
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1301
OpenAlex

Cite This

Robert B. Jackson, Estéban G. Jobbágy, Roni Avissar et al. (2005). Trading Water for Carbon with Biological Carbon Sequestration. Science , 310 (5756) , 1944-1947. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1119282

Identifiers

DOI
10.1126/science.1119282