Abstract

accuracy studies, readers must understand the design, conduct, analysis, and results of such studies. That goal can be achieved only through complete transparency from authors. Objective: To improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate its generalisability. Methods: The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and ex-tracted potential items into an extensive list. Research-ers, editors, and members of professional organisations shortened this list during a two-day consensus meeting

Keywords

ChecklistGeneralizability theoryDiagnostic accuracyMedicineTransparency (behavior)Medical physicsTest (biology)MEDLINEComputer scienceData miningMedical educationPsychologyRadiology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2015
Type
review
Citations
696
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

696
OpenAlex

Cite This

Patrick M. Bossuyt, Johannes B. Reitsma, David E. Bruns et al. (2015). Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) . https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010

Identifiers

DOI
10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010