Abstract

This article argues that the theme of the 2003 American Educational Research Association conference, “Accountability for Educational Quality: Shared Responsibility,” reflects a disturbing move in educational research away from inquiry and interrogation and toward the purpose of serving policy. This is related to wider political and rhetorical moves by which we both construct and are constructed by what Ball described as “global policyscapes” within which “thinking otherwise” becomes almost an impossibility. Our involvement, as educational researchers, in this process represents a form of collusion in our own oppression, the “organization of consent” embedded in Gramsci’s concept of hegemony, and there is an urgent need for a radical rethinking of our roles, rights, and responsibilities as researchers. A plea is made for a determined move toward “thinking outside the box” at a time when, and precisely because, to do so is conceived of as a form of heresy.

Keywords

ImpossibilityAccountabilitySociologyYesterdayPleaRhetorical questionHeresyHegemonyPoliticsInterrogationEpistemologyLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Masculinities and Globalization

Recent social science research has made important changes in our understanding of masculinities and men's gender practices, emphasizing the plurality and hierarchy of masculinit...

1998 Men and Masculinities 706 citations

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
111-129
Citations
37
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

37
OpenAlex

Cite This

Elizabeth Atkinson (2004). Thinking Outside the Box: An Exercise in Heresy. Qualitative Inquiry , 10 (1) , 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403259495

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/1077800403259495