Thermal Stability of Lithium Nickel Oxide Derivatives. Part II:  Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.70</sub>Co<sub>0.15</sub>Al<sub>0.15</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.90</sub>Mn<sub>0.10</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0.50 and 0.30). Comparison with Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>1.02</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.89</sub>Al<sub>0.16</sub>O<sub>2</sub>

2003 Chemistry of Materials 152 citations

Abstract

he thermal degradation mechanism of LixNi0.70Co0.15Al0.15O2 and LixNi0.90Mn0.10O2 (x = 0.50 and 0.30) was studied by thermal gravimetric analysis coupled with mass spectrometry. Correlation with in situ X-ray diffraction experiments was then achieved to determine the degradation mechanism and to explain the differences in thermal stability observed depending on the material composition. The degradation occurs in two steps: ...

Keywords

SpinelNickelThermal stabilityMaterials scienceManganeseCobaltLithium (medication)Phase (matter)VanadiumPhase transitionGravimetric analysisLamellar structureAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Inorganic chemistryThermodynamicsChemistryMetallurgyPhysics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Capacity Fading of Ni-Rich Li[Ni<sub><i>x</i></sub>Co<sub><i>y</i></sub>Mn<sub>1–<i>x</i>–<i>y</i></sub>]O<sub>2</sub> (0.6 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 0.95) Cathodes for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Ion Batteries: Bulk or Surface Degradation?

Ni-rich Li[NixCoyMn1–x–y]O2 cathodes (x = 0.6, 0.8, 0.9, and 0.95) were tested to characterize the capacity fading mechanism of extremely rich Ni compositions. Increasing the Ni...

2018 Chemistry of Materials 1484 citations

Publication Info

Year
2003
Type
article
Volume
15
Issue
23
Pages
4484-4493
Citations
152
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

152
OpenAlex

Cite This

M. Guilmard, Laurence Croguennec, Claude Delmas (2003). Thermal Stability of Lithium Nickel Oxide Derivatives. Part II:  Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.70</sub>Co<sub>0.15</sub>Al<sub>0.15</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.90</sub>Mn<sub>0.10</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (<i>x</i> = 0.50 and 0.30). Comparison with Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>1.02</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>Ni<sub>0.89</sub>Al<sub>0.16</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. Chemistry of Materials , 15 (23) , 4484-4493. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm030340u

Identifiers

DOI
10.1021/cm030340u