Abstract

Over the last decade, international regimes have become a major focus of empirical research and theoretical debate within international relations. This article provides a critical review of this literature. We survey contending definitions of regimes and suggest dimensions along which regimes vary over time or across cases; these dimensions might be used to operationalize “regime change.” We then examine four approaches to regime analysis: structural, game-theoretic, functional, and cognitive. We conclude that the major shortcoming of the regimes literature is its failure to incorporate domestic politics adequately. We suggest a research program that begins with the central insights of the interdependence literature which have been ignored in the effort to construct “systemic” theory.

Keywords

OperationalizationConstruct (python library)International relations theoryInternational relationsPositive economicsFocus (optics)PoliticsPolitical scienceInternational studiesSociologyEpistemologyEconomicsSocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

The Complexity of Interdependence

“Interdependence” has long been a cardinal element in theoretical analyses of international politics, but its utility has been hampered by disagreements over both the meaning of...

1993 International Studies Quarterly 36 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
491-517
Citations
773
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

773
OpenAlex

Cite This

Stephan Haggard, Beth A. Simmons (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization , 41 (3) , 491-517. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027569

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/s0020818300027569