Abstract
The structure of scientific collaboration networks is investigated. Two scientists are considered connected if they have authored a paper together and explicit networks of such connections are constructed by using data drawn from a number of databases, including MEDLINE (biomedical research), the Los Alamos e-Print Archive (physics), and NCSTRL (computer science). I show that these collaboration networks form “small worlds,” in which randomly chosen pairs of scientists are typically separated by only a short path of intermediate acquaintances. I further give results for mean and distribution of numbers of collaborators of authors, demonstrate the presence of clustering in the networks, and highlight a number of apparent differences in the patterns of collaboration between the fields studied.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Co‐Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis*
In recent decades there has been growing interest in the nature and scale of scientific collaboration. Studies into co‐authorship have taken two different approaches. The first ...
Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery
We examine the interface between for‐profit and publicly funded research in pharmaceuticals. Firms access upstream basic research through investments in absorptive capacity in t...
Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis
The existence of social organization within a research area may be inferred (a) if scientists who have published in the area have more social ties with one another than with sci...
The skewness of science
Scientific publications are cited to a variable extent. Distributions of article citedness are therefore found to be very skewed even for articles written by the same author, ap...
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Abstract A new form of document coupling called co‐citation is defined as the frequency with which two documents are cited together. The co‐citation frequency of two scientific ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2001
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 404-409
- Citations
- 4343
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.98.2.404