Abstract

Validation of qualitative research is here discussed in relation to postmodern conceptions of knowledge. A modernist notion of true knowledge as a mirror of reality is replaced by a postmodern understanding of knowledge as a social construction. Of the common psychometric concepts of validity, predictive validity is related to a modernist correspon dence theory of truth, whereas construct validity may be extended to encompass a social construction of reality. Three approaches to validity are outlined in some detail. First, validity is treated as an expression of craftsmanship, with an emphasis on quality of research by checking, questioning, and theorizing on the nature of the phenomena investigated. Second, by going beyond correspondence criteria of validity, the emphasis on observation is extended to include conversation about the observations, with a communicative concept of validity. Third, by discarding a modern legitimation mania, justification of knowledge is replaced by application, with a pragmatic concept of validity. In conclusion, the validity of the validity question is questioned.

Keywords

Construct validityValidityPsychologyPredictive validityEpistemologyExternal validityConversationConcurrent validityCriterion validitySocial psychologyPsychometricsDevelopmental psychologyPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SOCIAL REALITY

This short treatise looks at how we construct a social reality from our sense impressions; at how, for example, we construct a five-pound note with all that implies in terms of ...

2018 University of Iowa Press eBooks 4820 citations

Publication Info

Year
1995
Type
article
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
19-40
Citations
789
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

789
OpenAlex
71
Influential
354
CrossRef

Cite This

Steinar Kvale (1995). The Social Construction of Validity. Qualitative Inquiry , 1 (1) , 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100103

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/107780049500100103

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%