Abstract
A meta‐analysis was conducted with 23 studies to assess the relationship between supervisory ratings and results‐oriented measures of performance. As hypothesized, the corrected mean correlation was higher when a relative (versus absolute) rating format was used and when a composite (versus overall) rating method was used. These differences did not, however, account for all of the remaining variance around the relationship between ratings and results. Suggestions are offered for the direction of future research and practice.
Keywords
PsychologyMeta-analysisVariance (accounting)Rating scaleCorrelationSocial psychologyStatisticsApplied psychologyClinical psychologyEconometricsDevelopmental psychologyAccountingMathematics
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Do intentions predict condom use? Metaanalysis and examination of six moderator variables
This study used meta‐analysis to quantify the relationship between intentions and behaviour in prospective studies of condom use. The effects of six moderator variables were als...
Students' Test Performances
To identify the dimensions underlying students' causal attributions for their test performance, attribution ratings obtained from high-school students immediately after they rec...
Factor structure of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale: Motor examination section
Abstract The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is widely used to asses Parkinson's disease (PD) disability but its metric properties have not been extensively stu...
Corporate Saints and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance
This article utilizes a two-dimensional view of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to examine the relationships between corporate financial performance and experts9 ratings o...
Testing the Equivalence of Translations of Widely Used Response Choice Labels
The similarity in meaning assigned to response choice labels from the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) was evaluated across countries. Convenience samples of judges (range, 10 to 117...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 811-826
- Citations
- 238
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
238
OpenAlex
Cite This
Robert L. Heneman
(1986).
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SUPERVISORY RATINGS AND RESULTS‐ORIENTED MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS.
Personnel Psychology
, 39
(4)
, 811-826.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00596.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00596.x