Abstract

Knowledge is rooted in experience and requires a form for its representation. Since all forms of representation constrain what can be represented, they can only partially represent what we know. Forms of representation not only constrain representation, they limit what we seek. As a result, socialization in method is a process that shapes what we can know and influences what we value. At base it is a political undertaking. This article addresses the politics of method and its effects on the character of educational research.

Keywords

Representation (politics)PoliticsSocializationPolitical socializationValue (mathematics)Limit (mathematics)EpistemologyCharacter (mathematics)SociologyProcess (computing)Positive economicsSocial psychologySocial sciencePsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceAmerican political scienceMathematicsLawEconomicsStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Order Without Design

In this lively and, ultimately, disturbing study of policy analysts who are employed in bureaucracies, the author finds a startling paradox. The analysts know that the papers th...

1989 Stanford University Press eBooks 255 citations

Publication Info

Year
1988
Type
article
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
15-20
Citations
195
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

195
OpenAlex

Cite This

Elliot W. Eisner (1988). The Primacy of Experience and the Politics of Method. Educational Researcher , 17 (5) , 15-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x017005015

Identifiers

DOI
10.3102/0013189x017005015