Abstract

Contemporary theories of politics tend to portray politics as a reflection of society, political phenomena as the aggregate consequences of individual behavior, action as the result of choices based on calculated self-interest, history as efficient in reaching unique and appropriate outcomes, and decision making and the allocation of resources as the central foci of political life. Some recent theoretical thought in political science, however, blends elements of these theoretical styles into an older concern with institutions. This new institutionalism emphasizes the relative autonomy of political institutions, possibilities for inefficiency in history, and the importance of symbolic action to an understanding of politics. Such ideas have a reasonable empirical basis, but they are not characterized by powerful theoretical forms. Some directions for theoretical research may, however, be identified in institutionalist conceptions of political order.

Keywords

PoliticsPositive economicsAction (physics)AutonomyInstitutionalismHistorical institutionalismInefficiencyNew institutionalismSociologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceEconomic systemSocial scienceEconomicsLawMicroeconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies

Culture influences action not by providing the ultimate values toward which action is oriented, but by shaping a repertoire or tool kit of habits, skills, and styles from which ...

1986 American Sociological Review 8259 citations

Publication Info

Year
1983
Type
article
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
734-749
Citations
3859
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3859
OpenAlex

Cite This

James G. March, Johan P. Olsen (1983). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review , 78 (3) , 734-749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1961840